USD 
GBP 
CAD 
INR 
AUD 
SGD 
Why Email Authentication Isn’t Enough to Stop BEC Attacks & How BIMI and VMC Help
Business Email Compromise (BEC) is quietly becoming one of the most costly cybercrimes globally. In 2024 alone, victims reported 2.77 billion dollars in losses across 21,442 BEC incidents. This makes it the second‑most expensive scam category tracked by the FBI’s IC3.
Technical email authentication measures like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are designed to block spoofed messages. Yet many BEC attacks come from legitimate email infrastructure or lookalike domains. What’s missing is a visual marker that assures recipients the sender is who they claim to be.
Enter BIMI and Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) which address this gap by bringing verified brand identity into the inbox interface. They turn cryptographic compliance into a visible cue. It helps recipients instantly discern legitimate brand communication from clever impersonation.
Why Existing Email Security Measures Still Leave Gaps
Before we explore how BIMI and VMC fill the gap, it’s important to understand the limitations of current standards.
SPF (Sender Policy Framework)
SPF checks if an email was sent from a server authorized by the sending domain. But it breaks under forwarding scenarios and doesn’t validate the “From” name, leaving users vulnerable to display name deception.
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail)
DKIM uses cryptographic signatures to verify email authenticity, but it operates on a server-to-server basis and does not encompass the end user experience of the email sender identity.
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance)
DMARC builds on SPF and DKIM to enforce policies for message delivery and reporting. However, its effectiveness depends heavily on the policy set:
- Many organizations use p=none for monitoring only.
- Even with p=quarantine or p=reject, attackers can register lookalike domains (paypall.com, g00glemail.com) that still pass SPF/DKIM under a different domain.
Additionally, these protocols work silently. Most email users never see them. This is why human error is always the last line of defense, and usually the most vulnerable one. There is no chance to visually guarantee the sender identity, so people are dependent on names and logos which can be easily faked.
BIMI and VMC: Making Email Identity Visually Verifiable
This is where BIMI (Brand Indicators for Message Identification) and VMC (Verified Mark Certificates) enter the picture – not as replacements for SPF/DKIM/DMARC, but as their visual counterpart.
What is BIMI?
BIMI is a standard that allows organizations to display their official logo alongside authenticated emails in the recipient’s inbox.
It leverages existing email authentication protocols (specifically DMARC) and attaches a brand logo hosted on a public DNS record. But not just any logo; only those from domains with properly enforced DMARC are eligible.
What is a VMC?
A VMC is a digital certificate which is issued by a Certification Authority to verify the legitimacy of the brand logo and domain. To get a VMC, the logo has to be trademarked and undergo a strict vetting process. VMC is what allows the blue checkmark in the text next to the logo in Gmail, indicating that the brand is verified.
In other words:
- BIMI = mechanism to show the logo
- VMC = cryptographic validation of that logo + domain pairing
This combination puts a clear, trustable identity marker in front of the user, allowing them to make better decisions before engaging with the message.
How BIMI/VMC Counter BEC Tactics
Let’s break down common BEC attack vectors and how BIMI/VMC proactively stop them:
| BEC Tactic | How BIMI/VMC Reduce Risk |
|---|---|
| Impersonation of executives | Only legitimate senders can display the verified brand logo, making fake emails stand out instantly. |
| Use of lookalike domains | Fraudulent domains don’t have access to the brand logo or Gmail’s verified checkmark. |
| Display name spoofing | Users are trained to look for the brand logo and checkmark instead of relying on names alone. |
| Fake vendor invoices | Lack of visual identity can signal to users that the email isn’t from an approved source. |
| Internal communication mimicry | Employees can distinguish between internal messages (with verified branding) and external threats. |
The human brain processes images faster than text. A missing logo or checkmark instantly signals “something’s off.” BIMI and VMC turn email authentication into a visual security cue, shifting the burden of verification from the backend to the user in a seamless way.
VMC Requires DMARC: A Two-in-One BEC Defense
The thing about VMC is that it cannot be implemented unless DMARC is enforced at a strong policy level (p=quarantine or p=reject). That means VMC indirectly pushes organizations to close the email security gap from both ends:
- Backend authentication: SPF, DKIM, and DMARC must be properly configured and enforced.
- Frontend assurance: Verified visual markers (logo + checkmark) are now visible in inboxes.
This mandatory DMARC enforcement is a technical requirement and also a security benefit. By pursuing VMC, organizations inherently harden their domain against spoofing and improve how legitimate messages are trusted by recipients.
This is a rare win-win in the security world: a compliance-driven improvement that also boosts user confidence.
Why Visual Trust Is Now a Necessary Layer of Email Security
Cybercriminals don’t need to hack your infrastructure to cause damage. All they need is to convince someone that they’re you. With brand impersonation at the core of so many BEC attacks, the idea that email trust can be built without visual verification is no longer viable.
Visual cues like logos and checkmarks:
- Help users navigate inboxes crowded with alerts, notifications, and spam
- Provide a split-second recognition of authenticity
- Reduce reliance on “gut feeling” or IT training alone
At a time when every major platform is leaning into verified identities, whether it’s social media, banking, or messaging apps, email must catch up. BIMI and VMC are security tools that help organizations defend against evolving threats.
Adoption Is Growing – and So Are the Benefits
Major enterprises like Google, PayPal, CNN, and Chase have already implemented BIMI and VMC to strengthen email trust. Even government agencies in countries like the U.S., the Netherlands, and Canada have begun adopting strict DMARC + BIMI/VMC strategies to mitigate impersonation.
Benefits of BIMI and VMC adoption include:
- Lower phishing success rates (as reported by companies after implementation)
- Increased email open rates due to visible brand recognition
- Reduced helpdesk tickets related to suspicious emails
- Better engagement and trust from partners, customers, and vendors
The early adopters are seeing it as a brand protection initiative and a deliverability enhancement. With Gmail, Apple Mail, and Yahoo Mail supporting BIMI and VMC, the infrastructure for visual trust is already in place.
Conclusion
Today’s cybercriminals don’t break in; they log in. And they don’t just spoof; they convince. BIMI and VMC offer a modern solution for a modern problem: they bring visual authentication to the human layer of email security, where most BEC attacks succeed.
If your brand is worth protecting from impersonation, start with verified visibility. Adopt BIMI and VMC, and turn every email into a mark of trust.
Related Articles:
